Going to Steubenville, Daring to take the Jason Stellman Test

Steubenville diptic

Last weekend Jackie and I went to the Steubenville “Defending the Faith” conference with another couple from my home parish. We were both high school chaperones at a Steubenville high school conference last summer, and singing evangelical worship songs as the Eucharist processes through the gymnasium holds a special place in each of our hearts. It was a pleasure getting to hear Teresa Tomeo, Brandon Vogt, Peter Kreeft, Scott Hahn, Patrick Madrid, and many others teach. But do you know what my favorite part of the weekend was? Sunday morning, listening to Jason Stellman tell his conversion story (listen to other versions of his story here).

Interestingly enough, Jason Stellman began publicly exploring Catholicism about the same time I left seminary  (and caused a stir in evangelical circles)for that reason I feel connected to his journey. Jason went from investigating another Presbyterian pastor for sounding suspiciously Catholic to becoming Catholic himself. He left his full-time pastor job to take this plunge and, sadly, his wife and family have thus far not followed suit.

JasonStellmanSMThe most striking part of Jason’s talk was when he related the story of his decision to try and read the New Testament through a Catholic lens, something I’ll call the Jason Stellman Test. This is difficult for any Protestant, including me–many of these verses and stories have been interpreted in one particular way since Vacation Bible School. But here was his striking conclusion: Although his theology as a Calvinist Protestant could explain away all of the troublesome verses, if the Gospel writers were truly of his same theology then they never would have said those things in the first place!

Think about it. What is Matthew 25 doing in the Bible if Jesus believed in “faith alone?” Why must you “do the will of my Father” to go to heaven? (Matthew 7:21). Why all the troublesome verses about baptism in Romans 6, 1 Peter 3? Why does no author ever say “faith alone” except to say that we’re not saved by faith alone? Again, I’m not arguing that Protestants have no answers to these problems because I know many of them. The question, though, is why were the troublesome verses written in the first place?

Let me know your thoughts and if you find the Jason Stellman Test credible.


2 thoughts on “Going to Steubenville, Daring to take the Jason Stellman Test

  1. Absolutely. The “catholic lens” is the lens that helps me see the New Testament as coherent. One of the factors in my conversion was the realization that those interpreters of the Bible, who lived closest to the times and culture of the New Testament (i.e. the Church Fathers) have to be more reliable guides to interpretation than post-reformation protestants. All those verses that troubled me as an evangelical are no trouble at all in the Catholic interpretive framework.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s